Seeing as I work in the university sector, I know that
since the New Labour days, universities have been
under too much pressure to be everything a Westminster
politician wants it to be. But, they're missing the boat.
Universities are so busy pleasing box-tickers that
they cannot do their real work, education and research.
more soon
checkit: Guardian
Let UK universities do what they do best – teaching and research
‘Micro-management of academics is relentlessly eroding their ability to teach and conduct research.’
Letters
Monday 6 July 2015 20.06 BST
Last modified on Tuesday 7 July 2015 11.11 BST
The UK’s universities can justifiably claim an outstanding international reputation, generating multiple direct and indirect benefits for society, and underpinning our core professions through training and education. Yet these attributes are being undermined and degraded from within and without, with innovation, creativity, originality and critical thought, as well as notions of social justice, being threatened by forces of marketisation demanding “competitiveness” and “efficiency” in teaching and research. This generates continuous pressures to standardise, conform, obey and duplicate in order to be “transparent” to measurement.
Government regulations are escalating pressures on academics, insisting they function as 'small businesses'
Government regulations and managerial micro-management are escalating pressures on academics, insisting they function as “small businesses” covering their own costs or generating profits. Highly paid university managers (and even more highly paid “management consultants”) are driving these processes, with little regard for, or understanding of, the teaching and research process in higher education. Yet these outdated models of “competitiveness” and “efficiency” have long since been rejected not only by those who believe in quality education as a force for social change but also by progressive business thinking worldwide. This deprofessionalisation and micro-management of academics is relentlessly eroding their ability to teach and conduct research effectively and appropriately. A compliant, demoralised and deprofessionalised workforce is necessarily underproductive, and cannot innovate.
Unprecedented levels of anxiety and stress among both academic and academic-related staff and students abound, with “obedient” students expecting, and even demanding, hoop-jumping, box-ticking and bean-counting, often terrified by anything new, different, or difficult. Managerial surveys then “measure” their consumer “satisfaction” – such are the low ambitions of today’s universities, locked into a conservative status quo mentality; for what is there left to learn, when you already know it in order to demand it?
Advertisement
We call upon parliament’s newly elected education committee to conduct an urgent investigation into these grave matters.
Professor Karin Lesnik-Oberstein University of Reading
Professor Erica Burman University of Manchester
Professor Ian Parker University of Leicester
Dr Shaun Grech The Critical Institute
Dr Richard House The Critical Institute
Peter Abbs Professor emeritus, University of Sussex
Patrick Ainley Professor of training and education, University of Greenwich
Priscilla Alderson Professor emerita of childhood studies, UCL Institute of Education
Dennis Atkinson Professor emeritus Goldsmiths University of London
Professor Jim Aulich Manchester Metropolitan University; Manchester School of Art
James Avis Professor of PCET, School of Education, University of Huddersfield
Stephen Ball Karl Mannheim Professor of sociology of education, Institute of Education/UCL
Bernard Barker Emeritus professor of education, University of Leicester
Emeritus Professor Michael Bassey Nottingham Trent University
Professor Ann-Marie Bathmaker University of Birmingham
Tina Beattie Professor of Catholic studies, University of Roehampton London
Lori Beckett Professor of teacher education, Leeds Beckett University
Professor Andrew Bennett Department of English, University of Bristol
Professor Gargi Bhattacharyya Department of sociology, University of East London
Andreas Bieler Professor of political economy, University of Nottingham
Professor Michael Billig Loughborough University
Professor David Brauner Department of English literature, University of Reading
Marie Breen-Smyth Professor of international politics, University of Surrey
Roger Brown Emeritus Professor of higher education policy, Liverpool Hope University
Vanessa Burholt Professor of gerontology, Swansea University
Professor Hugh Burkhardt University of Nottingham and UC Berkeley
Professor Diana Burton Faculty of education health & wellbeing University of Wolverhampton
Professor Mark Burton Manchester Metropolitan University
Professor Peter Buse Head, School of performance and screen studies, Kingston University
Professor Catherine Casey University of Leicester
Clive Coen Professor of neuroscience, King’s College London; Chair, Rationalist Association
Professor Helen Colley
Margaret Cox Emerita professor of information technology in education, King’s College London
Professor Gill Crozier University of Roehampton
Anne Douglas Research professor Grays School of Art, Robert Gordon University, Aberdeen
Professor Windy Dryden
Professor Richard Dyer King’s College London and St Andrews University
Kathryn Ecclestone Professor of education, University of Sheffield
Emeritus Professor Tony Edwards
John Elliott Emeritus professor of education, University of East Anglia
Keri Facer Professor of educational and social futures, University of Bristol
Colin Feltham Emeritus professor, Sheffield Hallam University
Michael Fielding Emeritus professor of education, University College London Institute of Education
Professor Des Freedman Department of media and communications, Goldsmiths University of London
Emeritus Professor Frank Furedi University of Kent
John Furlong Emeritus professor of education, University of Oxford
Michael Gold Professor of comparative employment relations Royal Holloway University of London
Harvey Goldstein Professor of social statistics, University of Bristol
Daniel Goodley Professor of disability studies and education, University of Sheffield
Ivor Goodson Professor of learning theory, University of Brighton
Professor Brendan Gough School of social psychological & communication sciences, Leeds Beckett University
David E Gray Professor of leadership and organisational behaviour, University of Greenwich
Professor Lucy Green UCL Institute of Education, London
Professor Susan Greenfield
Professor Emeritus Carol Hall University of Nottingham
Professor Richard Hatcher Birmingham City University
Dave Hill Research professor in education, Anglia Ruskin University
Professor John Holford Robert Peers chair in adult education, University of Nottingham
Wendy Hollway Emeritus professor of psychology
Richard Hyman Emeritus professor of industrial relations
Professor Carol Jones Law school, University of Wolverhampton
Rita Jordan Emeritus professor in autism studies, University of Birmingham
Stephen Joseph Professor, School of education, University of Nottingham
Professor Carolyn Kagan
Terence Karran Professor of higher education policy
Celia Kitzinger Professor of conversation analysis in sociology, University of York
Dr Rebecca Lawthom Professor of community psychology, Manchester Metropolitan University
Marilyn Leask Professor of educational knowledge management, University of Bedfordshire
Professor Simon Lilley Head, University of Leicester’s school of management
Professor Ruth Lister
Professor Ruth Lupton University of Manchester
Morag McDermont Professor of socio-legal studies, University of Bristol
Professor Simon McGrath School of education, University of Nottingham
Meg Maguire Professor of sociology of education, King’s College London
Professor Tim May Centre for Sustainable Urban and Regional Futures, University of Salford
Professor Martin Milton Regents University London
Professor Louise Morley Director, Centre for Higher Education and Equity Research (CHEER), University of Sussex
Professor Emeritus Janet Moyles Early years and play consultant
Mike Neary Professor of sociology, University of Lincoln
Dany Nobus Professor of psychoanalytic psychology, Brunel University London
Mario Novelli Professor of education and social work, University of Sussex
Ozlem Onaran Professor of workforce and economic development policy, University of Greenwich
Professor Charles Oppenheim
Marilyn Osborn Emeritus professor of education, University of Bristol
Professor Jayne Osgood Centre for Education Research & Scholarship (CERS), Middlesex University
Martin Parker Professor of culture and organization, School of management, University of Leicester
Professor Nigel Parton Applied childhood studies, University of Huddersfield
Professor Ann Phoenix UCL Institute of Education
Professor David Pilgrim University of Liverpool
Professor Heather Piper
Jonathan Potter Professor of discourse analysis, Loughborough University
Ivan Powis Professor of Chemical Physics University of Nottingham
Colin Richards Emeritus professor, University of Cumbria
Professor Susan L Robertson University of Bristol
Professor Nicholas Royle University of Sussex
Professor Andrew Samuels University of Essex
Derek Sayer Professor of cultural history
John Schostak Professor of education, Manchester Metropolitan University
Professor Lynne Segal Psychosocial studies, Birkbeck College, London
Prem Sikka Professor of accounting, University of Essex
Professor Ernesto Spinelli ES Associates
Professor Corinne Squire Centre for Narrative Research, University of East London
Professor Jackie Stacey
Professor Guy Standing SOAS University of London
Paul Stenner Professor of social psychology, The Open University
Professor Howard Stevenson School of Education, University of Nottingham
Richard Taylor Emeritus professorial fellow, Wolfson College, Cambridge University
Lyn Tett Professor emerita, University of Edinburgh
Professor Harold Thimbleby
Professor Brian Thorne University of East Anglia and the Norwich Centre
Liz Todd Professor of educational inclusion, Newcastle University
Sally Tomlinson Emeritus professor, Goldsmiths London
Stan Tucker Professor of education and social policy, Graduate School, Newman University
Mathias Urban Professor of early childhood, University of Roehampton
Professor Isabella van Elferen Kingston University London
Valerie Walkerdine Distinguished research professor, Cardiff University
Professor Tim Waller Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge
Professor J Benjamin C Whitaker Head of physical chemistry, University of Leeds
Dr Stephen Whittle Professor of equalities law
Professor Sue Wilkinson Social sciences, Loughborough University
Professor Carla Willig City University London
Hugh Willmott Research professor in organization studies, Cardiff Business School, Cardiff University
Dr Janet Wilson Professor of English and postcolonial studies, University of Northampton
Emeritus Professor Richard MS Wilson Loughborough University
Terry Wrigley Visiting professor, Northumbria University
Michael Young Professor of education, UCL Institute of Education
Tuesday, 1 September 2015
Friday, 5 September 2014
it ain't just Osbo who is inumerate
Most of the Tory government is unable to function in the
jobs which they view as their birthright. Politics, that is.
The Torys decided to adopt the results of a gov study,
and raise fees for Uni students. In this way, uni students
are paying all the cost of their education. every last penny.
Most countries realise the benefit to the country of Uni,
and so students usually pay below 20% of the cost,
except in the UK and the US.
Weeehell. It turns out that they made two mathematical
errors in doing this dastardly plan , as if they cared.
Firstly, the money that they would be getting by deducting
tuition payments from tax would be astronomical for
somebody who was earning nearly £100K, which is
thankfully very rare.
(9% of income, per year)
Secondly, the gov have recognised the data that say
that kids just can't pay. The jobs market sucks,
thanks to UK gov austerity. So, the gov is not
getting as much money as it expected.
I guess their next move is to raise fees.
They have already tried to sell of the loan book
for the students to private vultures, which will
mean calls 24/7, bailiffs and court fees.
So , you can see how a country in decline feeds
on its young. That's the US and the UK.
Perfect. remind me. what was the purpose of
uni education, anyway?
jobs which they view as their birthright. Politics, that is.
The Torys decided to adopt the results of a gov study,
and raise fees for Uni students. In this way, uni students
are paying all the cost of their education. every last penny.
Most countries realise the benefit to the country of Uni,
and so students usually pay below 20% of the cost,
except in the UK and the US.
Weeehell. It turns out that they made two mathematical
errors in doing this dastardly plan , as if they cared.
Firstly, the money that they would be getting by deducting
tuition payments from tax would be astronomical for
somebody who was earning nearly £100K, which is
thankfully very rare.
(9% of income, per year)
Secondly, the gov have recognised the data that say
that kids just can't pay. The jobs market sucks,
thanks to UK gov austerity. So, the gov is not
getting as much money as it expected.
I guess their next move is to raise fees.
They have already tried to sell of the loan book
for the students to private vultures, which will
mean calls 24/7, bailiffs and court fees.
So , you can see how a country in decline feeds
on its young. That's the US and the UK.
Perfect. remind me. what was the purpose of
uni education, anyway?
checkit: Guardian
Tuition fees: former
Tory adviser says government got its maths wrong
Nick Hillman, who
worked for David Willetts on student loans regime, calls for action over
looming university funding gap
Rowena Mason, Shiv Malik, James Ball
Friday 21 March 2014 20.01
GMT
Jump to comments (553)
A former political
adviser to the Tory universities minister, David Willetts, has called for a
rethink of the tuition fees system and admitted the government "got its
maths wrong" by overestimating the amount of student debt that will be
repaid.
Nick Hillman, who
worked for Willetts during the introduction of the policy, made the comments
after it emerged that the rate of default on student loans is now so high that
the £9,000-a-year tuition fees system could end up producing zero financial
reward for the government.
Speaking to the
Guardian, Hillman called for action to address the "big funding gap"
looming in the universities sector caused by mistakes in the government's
modelling and the fact that graduates are earning less than expected.
Last night, the
Universities UK alliance of higher education institutions urged the coalition
to open talks with Labour on the issue, saying it was vital to think more
carefully about how universities can be paid for.
Under the current
fees regime students start paying their loans back once they are earning over
£21,000 at a rate of 9% of their salary above £15,000. Ministers originally
thought in 2010 that 28% of student loans would never be repaid and have
revised this upwards several times. The Guardian revealed Willetts' admission
that the true figure is now more like 45% – fast approaching the 48% threshold
at which experts say the benefits of raising fees to £9,000 are cancelled out.
Willetts has
previously denied that the changing estimates are any kind of "deep defect
in the system", saying changes to the numbers are purely a result of people
temporarily earning less than expected. The Department for Business, Innovation
and Skills said that the universities sector was well funded and the
"estimates can and will continue to change".
But Hillman said
there was no denying that "the government has got it wrong and therefore
there is a big funding gap and something has to be done about it".
He said: "The
thing that hasn't really entered the debate yet … is now we know how big the
shortfall is, what do you do about it? How much would you need to change the
loan system to actually solve the problem? I'm not defending the government.
The government has got the maths wrong, plus the economy has changed. The
£21,000 repayment threshold is in real terms much higher than the government
expected."…
Tuesday, 26 August 2014
How easy is it for a Minister to sell off his ministry?
This is the incredible story of how the UK was allowing
an idiot minister to ruin one of the most important
functions of society, the education of children.
It's amazing that this discovery was left to a children's
author, but Michael Rosen kicks butt. He went after
the government to get the Minister to reveal what
he did. Still, Rosen cannot get anybody interested
in reversing this bullshit.
Public assets given away, with no titles. Gove stealing
schools under any pretense , from councils and giving
them to his buddies.
I read this story and thought "this is willful class warfare."
an idiot minister to ruin one of the most important
functions of society, the education of children.
It's amazing that this discovery was left to a children's
author, but Michael Rosen kicks butt. He went after
the government to get the Minister to reveal what
he did. Still, Rosen cannot get anybody interested
in reversing this bullshit.
Public assets given away, with no titles. Gove stealing
schools under any pretense , from councils and giving
them to his buddies.
I read this story and thought "this is willful class warfare."
checkit: Michael
rosen
Gove
nicked our schools and handed them to his mates
Further
to the question of 'hey Gove, where have the title deeds of our state schools
gone?' there is a post on the Guardian comment is free site, in response to the
story about Gove's criticism of Etonians in the cabinet.
I
offer it with no comment. People better informed than me can judge whether it's
on the button or not...
Start:
"Since Gove took over - schools all over England failing, free schools
being shut down, academy companies being stripped of control of schools
Absolute
CHAOS - so why did Gove deliberately create such chaos
Each
time a school becomes an academy the council must hand over the title deeds for
the school if it has them (avg value £5m
per school)
As
over 2,000 schools have been forced to become academies that is £10 billion
(min) state assets Michael Gove has demanded the title deeds be handed to him
I
wrote an FOI request to Michael Gove's department and asked him where are the title deeds to England's
schools
After 3 months he still
refused to answer - I had to involve the information commissioner who wrote
and demanded they answer within 10 days
And
now we find out why Michael Gove did not want to answer the reply I got
The
department of Education has absolutely no
record of any of the title deeds for the school - not in paper format or
electronic format
Now
as councils held title deeds for state assets
safely for decades - and Michael Gove used the Academies Bill to force
councils to hand them to him - the Secretary of State For Education -
Where
are all the title deeds for the schools Mr Gove
At
the end they told me to write to a company the Tory Party Treasurer is on the
board of - and ask the private company
if they know what Michael Gove has done with the title deeds for state assets
Any good magician will tell you - create a
distraction - to get away with the trick
And
the trick here is - Michael Gove
transferring £10 billion of state assets to private companies - where no
payment was received for the state assets - and taxpayers forced to pay over £50,000,000 in legal fees alone to
fund the trick
Thatcher
sold state assets - Michael Gove gives them away - and some of the companies he
gave them away to - just happen to have very prominent Tory party members on
the boards - with us even paying all legal fees
Now
I live in Scotland - but if it was my school that became an academy I would be
writing to Michael Gove right now - and speaking to my councillors right now
and demanding to know where are the title deeds for my school - because these
schools are state assets (or they were until Michael Gove disposed of the title
deeds with absolutely not a thing on record in the Dof E)
that's
what you call magic
Now
the reality is Michael Gove has set up Southern Cross For Education - where
Academy
companies have the title deeds for
schools - they can sell them - and then sign extortionate leases to rent them
(and the money goes offshore to the
Cayman Islands as "excess funds")
Now
Gove changed the law to say Academy's
don't have to publish their accounts publicly - unlike every other charity in
the country
And
Gove changed the law to say No Academy
trustee can be held liable for any losses
And
Gove is currently trying to change the Academies bill to say instead of the
title deeds going to " the
proprietor of the school" - to "someone associated with the
school"
Now
does that mean the Tory Party Treasurer, instead of putting your school's title
deeds in Ark Schools name - he can
instead put your school's title deeds in the Tory Party Treasurer's name
Now
if that is not "cronyism" of the most absolutely shocking sort - I
don't know what is
Serious
investigations need to be asked as to how Michael Gove can have
"lost" the title deeds for £10 billion of state assets without a
trace - after councils kept them safe for decades!"
Saturday, 22 March 2014
Proof that Gove messes with curriculum
Those of you in UK know that this country is very
London-centric, and when it comes to politics,
very cabinet-centric.
The UK cabinet gets its fingers stuck into the most
minute details of daily life. So, when we say
"the minister is ruining the ministry", we know
what we're talking about.
One of the best guys for following the Education
minister, Michael Gove, is Michael Rosen,
my "stable-mate" at
michaelrosenblog.blogspot.com
This is what has happened to History, English
and Science, which has stood up to Gove.
checkit: michaelrosenblog
Gove had to listen to the science educators
Today, at a conference of primary science specialists, I got an interesting insight into the uneven way in which education policy is being arrived at. As many people reading this will know, when it comes to the English and History curricula in schools, Gove's fingerprints are all over the curriculum and - more importantly - the tests which de facto determine the curriculum. This has caused advisers to resign, send letters of protest and professional associations have sent written submissions which have been almost entirely overlooked. Decades of experience have been overlooked.
But what has happened with science.
It does seem as if Gove and gang have been forced to listen to what experienced teachers of science have told them. The draft curricula were rewritten. The science teachers and advisers seem to think that a truly awful document (the draft) has been thrown out and something much better has replaced it, though reservations were expressed about the fact that the notion of 'science' in primary schools was being weighted - perhaps too heavily - towards biology. A bit of a return to 'nature study' some felt....
London-centric, and when it comes to politics,
very cabinet-centric.
The UK cabinet gets its fingers stuck into the most
minute details of daily life. So, when we say
"the minister is ruining the ministry", we know
what we're talking about.
One of the best guys for following the Education
minister, Michael Gove, is Michael Rosen,
my "stable-mate" at
michaelrosenblog.blogspot.com
This is what has happened to History, English
and Science, which has stood up to Gove.
checkit: michaelrosenblog
Gove had to listen to the science educators
Today, at a conference of primary science specialists, I got an interesting insight into the uneven way in which education policy is being arrived at. As many people reading this will know, when it comes to the English and History curricula in schools, Gove's fingerprints are all over the curriculum and - more importantly - the tests which de facto determine the curriculum. This has caused advisers to resign, send letters of protest and professional associations have sent written submissions which have been almost entirely overlooked. Decades of experience have been overlooked.
But what has happened with science.
It does seem as if Gove and gang have been forced to listen to what experienced teachers of science have told them. The draft curricula were rewritten. The science teachers and advisers seem to think that a truly awful document (the draft) has been thrown out and something much better has replaced it, though reservations were expressed about the fact that the notion of 'science' in primary schools was being weighted - perhaps too heavily - towards biology. A bit of a return to 'nature study' some felt....
Friday, 22 February 2013
Engineering-free zone: the UK
why should the UK let a bit of technology
get in the way of their dumbing-down of
the plebs' kids in state schools?
Now, Google give the UK a friendly kick
in the head. I wonder why all the big
software companies are all American.
hhhmmm
checkit: Press Association
get in the way of their dumbing-down of
the plebs' kids in state schools?
Now, Google give the UK a friendly kick
in the head. I wonder why all the big
software companies are all American.
hhhmmm
checkit: Press Association
..Google boss attacks UK education
Dr
Eric Schmidt said Britain must drastically change its education system to avoid
…
....The
head of internet giant Google has attacked the British education system,
warning the country risks falling behind in the digital age unless it makes
drastic changes.
Dr
Eric Schmidt called for a return to a "Victorian" approach bringing
"art and science back
together".
Addressing
the Media Guardian Edinburgh International Television Festival, he is expected
to say something has to be done to "reignite" children's passion for
science and technology.
He
praised British television as a success story but warned "everything"
could still go wrong.
He
said: "If I may be so impolite, your track record isn't great.
"The
UK is home of so many media-related inventions. You invented photography. You
invented TV. You invented computers in both concept and practice. It's not
widely known, but the world's first office computer was built in 1951 by Lyon's
chain of tea shops. Yet today, none of the world's leading exponents in these
fields are from the UK."
Giving
the keynote MacTaggart Lecture, he added: "Think back to the glory days of
the Victorian era. It was a time when the same people wrote poetry and built
bridges."
The
IT boss said the UK has seen "a drift to the humanities" and people
were divided into boffins and luvvies.
He
said he was "flabbergasted" that computer science was not taught as
standard in UK schools, adding: "Your IT curriculum focuses on teaching
how to use software, but gives no insight into how it's made. That is just
throwing away your great computing heritage."
Dr
Schmidt is the first non-broadcaster to give the landmark lecture, which is
dedicated to the memory of actor and producer James MacTaggart.
Saturday, 30 June 2012
Cameron's patricide, or how immoral is Jimmy Carr?
When it comes to criticising a comic about his tax avoidance,
which until loosey-goosey UK law is not illegal, it's not far
for one to assume that David Cameron is criticising his
dead father and the offshore millions which that father hid
in the Caymans.
IshitUnot: 2 texts
Telegraph
which until loosey-goosey UK law is not illegal, it's not far
for one to assume that David Cameron is criticising his
dead father and the offshore millions which that father hid
in the Caymans.
IshitUnot: 2 texts
Telegraph
Jimmy Carr: 'I've made a terrible error of judgement'
By Hannah Furness | Telegraph
Jimmy Carr has pulled out of a tax avoidance scheme
after it was described as "morally wrong", saying he had made a
"terrible error of judgement".
The comedian had been exposed as the biggest beneficiary of the K2 scheme,
which protects money from tax
in Jersey.
In a statement released via his Twitter page, Mr Carr
apologised and promised to conduct his financial affairs "much more
responsibly".
He told his 2.3 million followers: "I appreciate
as a comedian, people will expect me to ‘make light’ of this situation, but I’m
not going to in this statement as this is obviously a serious matter.
"I met with a financial advisor and he said to me
'Do you want to pay less tax? It’s totally legal.' I said 'Yes.'
"I now realise I’ve made a terrible error of
judgement.
"Although I’ve been advised the K2 Tax scheme is
entirely legal, and has been fully disclosed to HMRC (Her Majesty’s Revenue and
Customs), I’m no longer involved in it and will in future conduct my financial
affairs much more responsibly. Apologies to everyone."
[Related link: Earn interest tax free - the top-paying
cash ISAs]
His mea culpa came after David Cameron said it was
"morally wrong" to avoid tax using such a scheme.
In response, Labour leader Ed Miliband said
politicians should not lecture people about morality.
Mr Miliband said: "I'm not in favour of tax
avoidance obviously, but I don't think it is for politicians to lecture people
about morality.
"I think what the politicians need to do is - if
the wrong thing is happening - change the law to prevent that tax avoidance
happening and I think that is the right course the Government should take.
... The tax
scheme is understood to protect £168m a year from the taxman in Jersey,
with Jimmy Carr as its largest beneficiary.
Speaking at the G20 summit the Prime Minister told ITV
News : "I think some of these schemes - and I think particularly of the
Jimmy Carr scheme - I have had time to read about and I just think this is
completely wrong.
... Today
it was claimed that members of pop group Take That had also invested at least £26m in a
scheme believed by HMRC to be a method of avoiding tax.
... Chancellor
George Osborne has claimed he was left
“shocked” after finding the extent to which multi-millionaires were
exploiting tax loopholes and vowed to take “action”. [nice bit of acting, George- ]
2
guardian.co.uk
Cameron
family fortune made in tax havens
Revealed:
David Cameron's father built up legal offshore funds in Panama and Geneva
Ed
Howker and Shiv Malik
Friday 20 April 2012 22.01 BST Article history
David
Cameron's father ran a network of
offshore investment funds to help build the family fortune that paid for the
prime minister's inheritance, the Guardian can reveal.
Though
entirely legal, the funds were set up in tax havens such as Panama City
and Geneva, and explicitly boasted of their
ability to remain outside UK
tax jurisdiction.
At the
time of his death in late 2010, Ian Cameron left a fortune of £2.74m in his
will, from which David Cameron received the sum of £300,000.
Cameron
and other cabinet members have recently suggested that they would be willing to
disclose their personal tax filings amid growing scrutiny following the budget,
but this would only shed light on annual sources of income rather than accumulated wealth or inheritance.
Thursday, 6 October 2011
how one picture can scare a nation
Does this man look like he's in control of his mind or his sphincter, let alone
the economy of one of the world's biggest countries?
Well, at his alma mater, Eton, there is a statue of Heracles/Hercules
holding one of the heads of the hydra. Herc kept cutting off heads
and they kept growing back.
It sounds like the banks. You just can't kill them. This world needs a Herc.
NOW!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)